Ask A Question

How does the second set of proposed regulations define original use when it comes to OZ property?

How can I make sure to meet the original use test?


Answers
  • Matt Campbell
    August 08, 2019

    The secnd set of proposed OZ regulations indicate that property unused or vacant for an uninterrupted period of at least five years before it is acquired or put into service by a QOF will be considered use. Also, a development not yet placed into service before a certificate of occupancy can meet the original use requirement. Document with good records for your file in case of audit. I can see how that might be challenging for an abandoned building for a number of years or just over five years. Electric bills or absence thereof might help. Affidavits by area residents are self-serving documents but may carry some weight.

  • Matthew Rappaport
    August 08, 2019

    You have to be the first taxpayer to use the property within the particular OZ where the property is located. There's an exception for structures abandoned more than five years.

  • John (Jack) Wegmann
    August 09, 2019

    The second set of proposed regulations provides that the "original use" of tangible property acquired by purchase by any person commences on the date when that person or a prior person first places the property in service in the QOZ for purposes of depreciation or amortization (or first uses the property in the QOZ in a manner that would allow depreciation or amortization if that person were the property's owner). Thus, tangible property located in the QOZ that is depreciated or amortized by a taxpayer other than the QOF or QOZB would not satisfy the original use requirement of Sec. 1400Z-2(d)(2)(D)(i)(II) under the second set of proposed regulations. Conversely, tangible property (other than land) located in a QOZ that has not yet been depreciated or amortized by a taxpayer other than the QOF or QOZB would indeed satisfy the original use requirement under Sec. 1400Z-2(d)(2)(D)(i)(II). However, the proposed regulations do clarify that used tangible property will satisfy the original use requirement with respect to a Qualified Opportunity Zone so long as the property has not previously been used within that qualified opportunity zone in a manner that would have allowed it to be depreciated or amortized) by any taxpayer. That said, the Treasury and IRS are proposing that where a building or other structure has been vacant for at least five years prior to being purchased by a QOF or a QOZB, the purchased building or structure will satisfy the original use requirement. In addition, improvements made by a lessee to leased property satisfy the original use requirement and are considered purchased property. Since land is not depreciable, it is not subject to the "original use" test, but rather, it can be treated as QOZBP only if used in a trade or business of a QOF or QOZB. The mere holding of land for investment does not give rise to a trade or business within the meaning of Sec. 162 and such land would not be regarded as QOZBP. Finally, in the case real property other than land that fails to meet the "original use" test, the taxpayer must make substantial improvements to be considered QOZBP.

  • Blake Christian
    August 08, 2019

    There are many intricacies, but in general the QOF or QOZB will be treated as the original user of the following property acquired after 2017 in a taxable purchase: new asset which has ever been used by another taxpayer; used assets which had not previously been used in an OZ; new or used leased assets (from a lessee perspective); used buildings that the taxpayer invests additional improvements equal to the original cost basis of their purchase within 30 months; used personal property that is improved by the new owner by doubling each asset’s basis within 30 months of purchase (this will be a hard test to meet); unimproved land.

  • Maria De Los Angeles Rivera
    August 08, 2019

    In general, for purchased property original use will be when the property is first placed in service for depreciation purposes in a zone. Special rules for property that has being vacant for at least five years and for leased property. Also, special rule for real property that is substantially improved within 30 months.

  • Neil Faden
    August 11, 2019

    If the project has not yet been placed in service, then the use can be original use. The new regulations also clarify that if a project has been vacant for five years, there can be original use.

  • DISCLAIMER: 

    the information found on this website is intended to be general information; it is not legal or financial advice. Specific legal or financial advice can only be given by a licensed professional with full knowledge of all the facts and circumstances of your particular situation. You should seek consultation with legal and financial experts prior to participating in any aspect relating to Opportunity Zones. Posting a question on this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. All questions you post will be available to the public; do not include confidential information in your question.